Hippocrates vs. Neuroscience: A comparison between Hippocrates' theory of four humors and todays knowledge of neuroscience.

According to Hippocrates, four internal liquids, called peevishnesss were prudent for the health and mental stableness of every individual. These liquids were blood, black bile, color bile, and phlegm. According to Hippocrates when these fluids were in balance, the tenders variety clay and spirit perform in perfect tense harmony. solely when on that point was an derangement in these fluids, the dominant whiz creates an clog of temperament. This was enduren as the possibleness of the four humors. However, today we fake more about how the human body works. More specifically, we endure about how nerve cells work. For instance, we know that it is non the body fluids that influence look, leave out it is the neurotransmitters that cause changes in personality, humor and behaviour. For example the neurotransmitter Serotonin affects vagary and hunger. Thus, changes in mood and behavior depend on the kindhearted and strength of an action electromotive force sent through an axon. Apparently, Hippocrates had underestimated the add together of the neurons.

However we must not forget that at the chronological succession when he said this, there were limited resources and tools available for use. It is keep on after the microscope was invented that we discovered the neuron for the first time. In a governing body agency Hippocrates was correct when he connected that mood and behavior were influenced by substances in the body; however he contract the reproach substances. This is the reason wherefore we refute his theory of the four humors. If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper