The Randomness of Love and Baseball :: A Kind of Love Sports Athletics Essays

The Randomness of Love and BaseballGenerally the terms come, baseball, immigration, and meter are not mentioned within the same text. However, according to Andrei Codrescu, author of the try out A Kind of Love, all these subjects are related. The only task is that Codrescu fails to make these connections obvious to his audience. He also fails in making the place of his essay known and at that placefore is unsuccessful in whatever aspiration he intended. Codrescus essay fails because of its misuse of condolence, its all overbearing connotative vocabulary and, simply, its random nature.A Kind of Love starts off as the epithet suggests it might. Codrescu talks about how there are many different kinds of love and how his love for baseball fits into one of these categories. He then goes on a sporadic journey discussing several issues that have no logical connection to each other. He talks about his struggle as an immigrant to get off his citizenship. Then he jumps to how bas eball is extremely literary and can be compared to poetry. Then, to eve more random issues such as the history of baseball, the linguistic communication of the game, and he even goes as far as proclaiming a intellect of sexuality in baseball. There is absolutely no flow to Codrescus writing and his loose ends do nothing but ensure that there will be no tying together of his random thoughts.Codrescu uses an over bearing amount of connotative language in his essay, which makes knowing on the nose what he means hard to understand. He uses several examples of famous writers, philosophers, and even places. Dawson, Malamud, Edgar Allan Poe, and Freud, were just some of these famous people who were mentioned. Codrescu assumes that everyone in his audience is awake and knowledgeable on every subject he mentions, which in some cases is an unrealistic assumption on his behalf. He uses words that relate to a deeper, symbolic meaning from personal emotional associations so much that the referee becomes lost in translation. There is no doubt that Codrescu uses the strategy of pathos to appeal to his audience. He starts this off very well by large-minded very real and vivid descriptions of what it was like for him to witness his first baseball game. He recalls where the game was played, when it was played and who was playing. He also remembers sitting there, in the stands, knowing nothing about the game and not even being able to tell who was scoring and when.